Designing for friction to achieve 80% creator verification

I owned the redesign of Fanspark's creator verification experience, transforming a mandatory compliance requirement into a trust-building experience. By strategically staging friction and increasing transparency, the redesigned flow achieved an 80% verification completion rate after launch.

Role

Product Designer

Timeline

2 Months

Team

1 CEO, Co-Founder

1 CPO, Co-Founder

1 CTO

3 Engineers

Context

Creator verification shifted from social authentication to ID verification

Fanspark, a sports creator platform, needed to verify creators before they could post content and monetize. When business requirements changed, we moved from social authentication to Stripe Identity to prevent fraud and maintain compliance.

This meant asking creators to provide significantly more sensitive information.

The Problem

ID verification introduced significantly more friction by asking for sensitive personal information

Identity verification required creators to submit a government ID and take a selfie, introducing significantly more friction than social authentication, which is familiar and low-friction.

The Challenge

Make identity verification easy to complete while meeting compliance requirements

With ID verification now required, I had to balance competing needs: make the experience feel trustworthy and easy to navigate for creators, while preserving the verification requirements needed for fraud prevention and compliance.

Constraints

Designing with fixed requirements

Third-party dependencies

Stripe owned the identity verification experience limiting what could be designed

Narrow scope

Scoped to the verification flow only, though testing suggested trust issues existed across the broader onboarding experience

Non-neogtiable requirements

Identity verification was required and could not be removed or bypassed

Short timeline

Shipping an improved experience first, with planned measurement and iteration post-launch

Current State Audit

Identifying opportunities to reduce friction

I audited the existing flow from the creator's perspective, focusing on moments that could create hesitation, confusion or unnecessary effort.

Build trust before requesting sensitive information

Creators needed more context around why each step was required and how their information would be used

Reduce percieved friction

Dense, text-heavy screens made it difficult for creators to quickly understand each step.

Give creators control

Forcing creators through the process could make the experience feel restrictive

Design Decision 01

Re-ordered steps from least to most sensitive

I strategically re-ordered verification steps so creators would encounter low commitment asks first, allowing creators to build trust incrementally before asking for a government ID and selfie.

Design Decision 02

Surfaced the benefit before the ask

Led with what verification unlocks for creators, reframing the flow from obligation to value.

Design Decision 03

Added context at the point of each request

Added explanations at the moment each piece of information was requested, replacing uncertainty with reasoning.

Outcome

80% completion rate at launch

Before launch, I tested the experience with creators to validate the overall structure and identify areas where additional explanation or guidance could improve the experience.

Reflection

What I Learned

Sometimes friction is necessary. When you're asking users to provide sensitive information, the design opportunity is to make that friction clear, intentional, and trustworthy without treating the user experience as an afterthought.